Our Recent DUI Victories The following is a list of the firm's most recent DUI wins. Parks & Braxton provides the case number, the judge's name, as well as the date the DUI was won for authenticity purposes. Jun 26, 2002 Case: 01-026263TCA08 Judge Moyle Facts: Result: The State dropped the DUI to a reckless driving. Jun 26, 2002 Case: 01-028334TCA99 Judge Damico Facts: Result: The State dropped the DUI to a reckless driving. Jun 17, 2002 Case: 260450-W Judge Krieger-Martin Facts: Result: The case was dismissed. May 28, 2002 Case: 061432-BDY Judge Mills-Francis Facts: Result: The State dropped the DUI to a reckless driving. May 22, 2002 Case: 01-026265TCA99 Judge Ciklin Facts: Result: The State dropped the DUI to a reckless driving. Apr 10, 2002 Case: 02-013051TCA99 Judge Moyle Facts: The defendant was stopped for running a stop sign. Police observed odor, bloodshot eyes, and a statement "Yea I'm drunk again". The defendant refused all testing. (3rd offense for DUI). Result: Motion to dismiss granted for destruction of evidence. All charges dismissed. Jan 11, 2002 Case: 01-022818MM10A Judge Cowart Facts: The Defendant was observed weaving on Oakland Park Blvd. Defendant stumbled out of car. Defendant admits to drinking "shots". Result: The State dropped the DUI. The defendant has no conviction on her record. Case: 24-CM-003133 Judge Rich Facts: The defendant was stopped after he was observed weaving all over the road. Officers noticed an odor of alcohol, red/watery eyes, he fumbled with his documents, and he appeared unsteady. Officer noticed a vegetative like substance on the defendant's person that appeared to be marijuana. He refused to perform any field sobriety tests and was arrested for DUI. He later refused a urine test. Defense: Officers believed he was impaired by drugs and not alcohol. Under Florida law, to prove DUI, the State must prove what the defendant was impaired by. Under the DUI statute 316.193, it must be either alcohol, a specific chemical, or specific controlled substance and/or combination of the latter. Here, there was no odor of alcohol, no mention of drugs, no alcohol or drugs found. Thus, the State could not prove by what specific substance was impairing the defendant. One cannot just be impaired by "anything.” The cops never sent any of the "vegetative" substances off to the lab for testing. Result: The DUI was Dismissed. Case: 24-CT-044719 Judge Musselman Facts: The defendant was stopped for speeding. Officers noticed an odor of alcohol, mumbled speech, and a fixed gaze. She stated she had consumed two beers, swayed while she stood, and she used the car for balance. After performing the HGN (eye test), walk and turn, and one leg stand exercises, she was arrested for DUI. She later refused a breath test. Defense: After several negotiations with the State regarding the evidence and the defendant, the State Dropped the DUI. Result: The State dropped the DUI. 3509 results found. Viewing page 36 of 36. Go to page 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 . . . 32 33 34 35 36